apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Moby Dick: A Pop-Up Book

(Hello to Tammy, one of four bloggers trying out for a spot on the Ohdeedoh editorial team. Comments are welcome!)

2008-05-289-moby.jpgDespite having a literature degree, we’ve never been able to finish Moby Dick. That is, until now. As it turns out, pictures really help.

This principle is especially true when the pictures are rendered gorgeously in three dimensions by artist Sam Ita, former apprentice to master paper engineer Robert Sabuda. The quality of the artwork elevates this hefty tome from kids’ book to all-ages coffee table book.

 
 

2008-05-29-book.jpgThe drama and complexity of the story may have been slightly lost on our three-year-old (the book’s intended recipient, though officially the book is geared toward the 4-8 set), but the incredibly elaborate pop-up elements kept him enthralled for a solid hour on a rainy day, and that’s saying something.

Plus, if there’s anything cuter than a preschooler saying, “Why did Moby Dick want to wreck the Pequod?” we can’t imagine what it could be.

Find it at Amazon.

-Tammy

Tags

books, guides & resources, guest posts

Related Links

Share

Comments (10)

I love this! Pop-up books are a huge hit with my little boys. Thanks for the heads-up!

posted by bethbohicks on May 29th 2008 at 10:06am
view bethbohicks's profile

"Despite having a literature degree, we’ve never been able to finish Moby Dick. That is, until now."

Gals, this is where the impersonal "we" just does not work, and its usage on this site is not convincing. You each have bylines, so why can't you be more personal/personable? I was once a magazine editor, and I say put back authorial voice in your entries.

posted by stickyricemama on May 29th 2008 at 11:09am
view stickyricemama's profile

genxmom, I agree. I just couldn't bring myself to use the "we" when I submitted my post here (I was referring to my new son and motherhood) and opted to use the "I" even though I knew it wasn't the site's norm (and perhaps hurt my chances). It was just too strange for me in that instance. Sometimes it works and sometimes it just doesn't.

This is a great book! I also never finished Moby Dick and can now experience it with my child.

posted by schnappycat on May 29th 2008 at 11:32am
view schnappycat's profile

I assumed the poster meant "we" as in herself and the co-parent of the child in question. But then, I do know her in real life. Hi Tammy!

posted by taraariano on May 29th 2008 at 11:58am
view taraariano's profile

Heh. Hi, Tara!

It's true: my husband and I both studied literature, though we have only one degree between us. And neither of us has ever finished Moby Dick. So, grammatically, I didn't have a problem with the royal we. ;)

posted by TammyE on May 29th 2008 at 12:08pm
view TammyE's profile

Great book tip! I will totally check it out. My 3-year-old will love it.

(And, hi Tam!)

posted by Alexandra F on May 29th 2008 at 3:11pm
view Alexandra F's profile

What a gorgeous book! Beats the Bob the Builder & Mighty Cars books we've been reading these days... ugh. Hi Tam!

posted by AnneMarieL on May 29th 2008 at 5:17pm
view AnneMarieL's profile

I'm not faulting the writers. Nope. A better phrasing would have read, "Despite a literature degree between us, my husband and I have never finished Moby Dick." Or "Despite our literary studies, my husband and I have never finished Moby Dick." Leading off with the "we" created ambiguity. That's all I was saying about it not working. Hello, antecedent?

posted by stickyricemama on May 29th 2008 at 7:10pm
view stickyricemama's profile

I think Tammy's writing was generally good though the AT "we" bugs me in general. So it's not her fault.

I love the book tip. Thank you!

posted by piachka on May 31st 2008 at 6:29am
view piachka's profile

Cool post. I, too, welcome any tips for books that will draw my toddler away from Bob the Builder!

posted by r8ermom on May 31st 2008 at 6:20pm
view r8ermom's profile