apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Plum Magazine

INGRIDplumsu.jpg
When we were pregnant, we were three years away from being considered, "Advanced Maternal Age." While images that label conjures up are less than flattering, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have begun a magazine that caters to pregnant women over the age of 35 who are considered to be of advanced maternal age.

 
 

According to Plum's Web site, "With topics ranging from birthing plans, prenatal testing, pregnancy myths, and mothering to entertaining, travel, fashion and culture, Plum gives the 35+ mom-to-be the know how and the support she needs throughout her pregnancy and beyond. She will be informed, entertained and moved as she learns about the best healthcare practices, the hottest trends, and the most poignant personal stories."

We haven’t read an issue – actually, we haven’t even seen an issue of Plum yet, but are curious about it. Is it really supporting women over the age of 35, or is it just another soapbox for the ACOG?

Can anyone comment?

Tags

books, guides & resources, pregnancy, Plum Magazine

Related Links

Share

Comments (13)

Is there something wrong with an ACOG soapbox?

posted by Carrie too on May 16th 2008 at 6:14am
view Carrie too's profile

please, i beg you... enough with the "we"

posted by emilyva on May 16th 2008 at 6:51am
view emilyva's profile

we is typical magazine speak

halle berry said her chart read "geriatric pregnancy"

posted by Lady J on May 16th 2008 at 7:36am
view Lady J's profile

My doctor's office gave me a free copy at my first appointment -- never mind that I am not over 35 and the issue was a year old.

It reminded me of a bridal magazine -- the only thing that changes month to month are the maternity dresses. The articles, checklists and "helpful hints" were so generic as to be completely unhelpful.

posted by mbm on May 16th 2008 at 7:41am
view mbm's profile

I'll look for it and check it out. I'm AMA and find myself COMPLETELY unable to relate to other pg women in their 20's.

posted by jairip on May 16th 2008 at 7:52am
view jairip's profile

i don't recall being terribly impressed with it. i guess it is supposed to fill a niche market, but the articles were general and didn't address any special needs or concerns of mothers-to-be 35 .

posted by bekka on May 16th 2008 at 9:22am
view bekka's profile

I read the one with Jeri Ryan on the cover and found it interesting. I'm 41 and five months pregnant with my first child. It wasn't all that different than the other pregnancy magazines, but it definitely skewed towards older mothers. I enjoyed it enough that I'll pick up the new issue when it's out.

posted by Pencils on May 16th 2008 at 9:32am
view Pencils's profile

Sorry, this is old news. I saw Plum in my OB's office in the first half of 2006. I didn't pay attention to previous issues. Back then the magazine was available only to med offices. It's the same old content every issue, isn't it? Stuff on testing, etc. "Advanced maternal age" meh. That term didn't bother me at all.

posted by stickyricemama on May 16th 2008 at 11:03am
view stickyricemama's profile

carrie too:

yes, there just might be something wrong with an ACOG soapbox. see "born in the usa: how a broken maternity system must be fixed to put women and children first" by marsden wagner.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/002-1875067-0369640?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=born in the usa&x=0&y=0

posted by bitsandbobbins on May 16th 2008 at 6:01pm
view bitsandbobbins's profile

I, too, was designated AMA. I vowed to NOT read any pregnancy magazines just because our society seems weirdly obsessed with pregnancy. I think it helped me along in what turned out to be a difficult pregnancy. I had zero expectations and laughed at the thought of a birth plan because I had no control over anything regarding the pregnancy. I wasn't exposed to "the perfect" pregnancy or labor and delivery so I took everything much more in stride. I highly recommend that approach to friends now.

posted by molly_DC on May 17th 2008 at 4:01am
view molly_DC's profile

Oh my god. The "we" needs to stop.

posted by eeka on May 17th 2008 at 4:08pm
view eeka's profile

Hah, I guess the "we" sounds a bit silly in the context of this particular post.. but I don't see the problem with it in regard to the rest of the blog. Like Lady J said, it's "typical magazine speak". I think it sort of creates a sense of community, actually.

posted by eirracoes on May 19th 2008 at 7:10pm
view eirracoes's profile

PLUM is no longer associated with ACOG.

posted by mjshipko on August 13th 2008 at 7:22pm
view mjshipko's profile